The deadline for responding to consultations is 18th December 2025.
You can respond by following the link in the email sent to members on Friday 12th December.
We have now prepared our responses to the Wanstead Village and South Woodford Road Safety schemes. Both proposals are limited because they put forward measures to reduce traffic speeds but not measures to reduce traffic volumes. Reducing accidents, deaths and injuries needs both.
South Woodford
The key points are:
Remove the one-way streets in the area.
Include anti rat run measures to reduce traffic volumes.
Wanstead Village
The key points are:
Rethink the proposals for New Wanstead, Herman Hill and Chigwell Road to reflect the volume of traffic using the roads and their function as connector roads and to avoid the risk of making things worse.
Include anti rat run measures to reduce traffic volumes.
Barkingside
The key points is
Cranbrook Road is where the many accidents happen, but the scheme does nothing to enforce a 20mph speed limit on the road
Something needs to be done at Gants Hill roundabout – and we have a proposal.
The other consultations
Pressure of time means that we are now unlikely to be make a detailed response to the Hainault scheme, but we are pleased to see the Council proposes reducing the speed limit on Forest Road to 30 mph.
You can read our response to the South Woodford scheme here.
You can read our response to the Wanstead Village scheme here.
You can read our response to the Barkingside scheme here.
If enough of us ask the Council to spend more on cycle infrastructure it’s possible that it might – especially as improving the provision for cyclists is an essential to implementing the Council’s Sustainable Transport Strategy:
“We have adopted a sustainable transport “road user hierarchy “which simply states that in our future decision-making, whether that be investments, how we designer scheme or our policies, we will consider the needs of certain people, ways of travelling and vehicle types before others.”
So, allocating more money to cycling will be the Council putting its money where its mouth is …
If we don’t ask for what we want, we will lose out to others who do. The survey is quick and easy. The two key questions are 3 and 4. Here are my answers to those two questions.
Q3. An independent nationwide survey carried out by IMPOWER saw Redbridge ranked as the most efficient and best value for money council in London and 2nd best in England. Though proud of this we’re not at all complacent and know there’s always room to improve. With that in mind, what could the council be doing that would make a positive difference for you?
A: Investing more, both in terms of money and staff, in cycling. The Borough should have a network of safe cycling routes so that residents can use bicycles to go about their daily lives – going shopping, taking their children to school, going to the railway station, the GP etc. This needs investment and council officers with suitable skills and in sufficient numbers to carry out the work.
Q4. When it comes to setting a budget, much of what councils do today focuses on the things that we have to provide – essential services like making sure we’ve got enough social workers to help our most vulnerable children and young people and collecting your waste and recycling. Where we do have more flexibility, it would be helpful to know what your local priorities are.
Of the following, please tick up to three areas you’d want us to prioritise in the future
þHighways – maintaining roads and pavements, fixing potholes, managing water gritting, and improving road safety and walking/cycling routes.
Full details are in the post below, but here are the headlines:
There’s a lot to like and the proposals deserve our support.
From a cyclists point of view we think the schemes could be improved by
Replacing not some but all the traffic islands along Aldersbrook Road with zebra crossings on raised tables.
Extending the restricted access hours on the Lake House estate to minimize motor vehicle traffic during the school run – to make it a school cycle.
Making Woodlands Avenue a school street – like Harpenden Road.
Replacing the speed cushions on St Marys Avenue with full width speed humps.
Introducing a rat running reduction scheme on the Warren Estate to stop traffic using the estate’s roads as a cut through from the A12 to Blake Hall Road.
Installing tiger crossings (cyclists and pedestrians) on each of the roads that enter the mini roundabouts at the junction of Aldersbrook Road, Centre Road, Lake House Road and Blae Hall Road. One is going in on Aldersbrook Road so why not on the others?
a proposal to introduce a rat running reduction scheme in the Lake House estate area.
And
a proposal to introduce a 20mph zone in the Wanstead area, covering the area south of the A12 and west of the A406 up to the Borough boundaries with Waltham Forest and Newham.
The closing dates for the consultations are 5th June 2025.
These are road safety schemes – they are intended to reduce deaths and injuries caused by road traffic accidents – rather than schemes designed to promote cycling and walking. But these schemes do effect cyclists and, if well designed, they can make cycling and walking more attractive options for more people. What you are reading now are our views on the schemes from a cyclist’s point of view. Other points of view are available. …
We have had a first look at the proposals and there’s a lot to like. This post sets out our first thoughts. As we think about the schemes more it’s quite likely that we will refine our thoughts and want to add some further comments. If we do, we will post an update on our website.
So, if you haven’t already responded to the surveys you might want to hold off doing so until nearer to the closing date. If you have already responded (well done) and you want to add anything in the light of what we have written, you can email your additional comments to traffic.schemes@redbridge.gov.uk.
Please feel free to use any of our comments in your response.
Before we look at the specific schemes in detail here are a few general remarks.
The areas covered by the proposals are almost all residential and so a speed limit of 20 mph is entirely sensible. The arguments sometimes used against 20 mph zones (which we don’t buy) that slowing down traffic across entire areas can clog up roads, delay journeys and hit productivity, especially for trades people and small businesses, won’t apply.
There’s no doubt that cyclists and pedestrians will welcome slower speeds. Cyclists will feel safer on the effected roads. If a cyclist is in a collision with a motor vehicle going at 20 mph, they are less likely to be killed or seriously injured than if the vehicle is travelling at 30 mph.
Transport for London have just published the findings of an extensive study of more than 150 20mph schemes implemented during this period 1989 to 2013. The study found:
That introduction of 20mph schemes led to a 40 per cent reduction in fatalities, falling from 15 to just nine, compared to a background trend of seven per cent fewer deaths across all borough roads.
Child safety improved dramatically with a 75 per cent reduction in children killed and a 50 per cent reduction in child casualties.
A 35 per cent reduction in collisions and a 36 per cent reduction in casualties on roads with 20mph limits.
It’s really what you would expect.
The seven pinch points at the traffic islands along Aldersbrook Road have long been a source of complaint amongst local cyclists. The cycle tracks end at the traffic islands where motor vehicles must move in towards the kerb and into the path of cyclists. Many a regular user of the cycle tracks will tell you how they have nearly been knocked off by cars swerving towards the kerb. Redbridge Cycling Campaign and individual cyclists have lobbied council officers and local councillors to do something about them and so, the proposal to remove two of them is welcome. But that still leaves five.
We can understand the problems of removing the two islands with speed cameras on them but why not replace the other three with zebra crossings? This would help pedestrians and it would make cyclists using the tracks along Aldersbrook Road feel safer. Why is this important? Because it is only when potential cyclists feel safe that they get on their bikes and become cyclists. And current cyclists coming from the Manor Park direction (for example from the Railway Station) could also use the zebra crossings to exit from Aldersbrook Road into the turnings of the Aldersbrook Estate – now it’s a difficult manoeuvre. So, we think more zebra crossings will be a win all round.
We are pleased to see that the Council plans to instal sinusoidal speeds humps – these are the most comfortable design for cyclists.
We will be supporting these schemes. Could they be improved upon to support the Council’s ambitions to see more people on bikes? Yes, and here’s how …
Lake House Rat Running Reduction Proposal
The proposal to introduce a No Entry Except for Access Restriction between 7 and 10am and 4 and 7pm is welcome but:
The success of last April’s Aldersbrook Bicibus event (parents and children riding to Aldersbrook School) proved that parents and children from the Lake House Estate want to get to school by bike. The timed no entry restriction will help create quiet roads on the estate that will be suitable for these parents and children to cycle – especially in the morning. If the afternoon timed restriction started at 2.30 or 3 pm then this would be better, removing the risk that parents and their children might meet early bird rat runners.
It’s hard to see why the restriction is not permanent: if rat running isn’t a problem between 10 am and 4 pm there is no harm in the restriction being in place because hardly anyone is nipping through the estate – and those few shouldn’t be because the main roads are OK.
Of course, the problem is that parents cycling from Lake House to Aldersbrook School then must cycle down Woodlands Avenue. This is not a cycle friendly street, but we think that there is a solution – more on that below.
Wanstead Area Road Safety Zone (South-West Area)
Replacing the traffic island at the junction of Queenswood Gardens and Aldersbrook Road with a zebra crossing is a good idea. It will provide better pedestrian access to the bus stop on the opposite side of the road, and we expect it will be welcomed by pedestrians.
As we mentioned above, Woodlands Avenue, despite having (fierce) speeds humps is not cycle friendly. With cars parked on either side of the road the effective carriageway is narrow and motor vehicles push past cyclists. The Avenue is also a rat run: motor vehicles travelling in the direction of Wanstead use Park Road and Woodlands Avenue to avoid the mini roundabouts. We think there is a solution: make Woodlands Road a school street with, in the hours of the school run, restricted access. This would mean installing cameras at either end of the road facing onto Park Road and Blake Hall Road. Motor vehicles trying to turn into Woodlands Avenue would be ticketed. Because the cameras face outwards, residents driving out of Woodlands Avenue go undetected, so they are fine. Residents can apply for an exemption so that they can drive into Woodlands Avenue during the restricted hours.
Wanstead Area Road Safety Zone (South-East Area)
Once again, replacing the traffic island at the junction of Empress Avenue and Aldersbrook Road with a zebra crossing is a good idea. It will help cyclists by removing one of the dangerous pinch points on Aldersbrook Road.
Motor vehicles do speed along Wanstead Park Avenue and so speed reduction measures are appropriate.
Wanstead Area Road Safety Zone (North Area)
There is a rat run through this area from the A12 along Redbridge Lane West, Langley Drive and Overton Road to Blake Hall Road. The council, rightly, thinks the Lake House estate needs a rat running reduction scheme. So surely the residents of this area deserve on too? And, of course, Wanstead High School is on the rat run.
St. Marys Avenue links Wanstead High Street to St. Mary’s Church and Wanstead Cricket, Golf and Tennis Clubs. It should be a cycle friendly road – one you can cycle along with your children as they go to their cricket, golf or tennis lessons – or to church! But it isn’t.
Many motor vehicles can straddle the speed pillows and so can, and do, disregard the speed limit. This puts off potential cyclists: parents will be driving their children to cricket etc. instead of cycling with them. The position of the pillows in relation to the kerb means that motor vehicles swerving into cyclists’ line of travel. If speed humps are right for all the other roads in the area, then surely, they are right for St Marys Avenue too. So, we think the pillows should be replaced by humps.
Can the scheme include improving the pedestrian crossing outside Wanstead House?
Redbridge Cycling Campaign 