Here is our final response to the consultation. Fingers crossed the Council does make a safe arrangement for two way cycling along Britannia Road. If it does then we think we will have a new useful and high quality piece of cycle infrastructure in the Borough.
Our response is as follows.
We think this could be a good proposal – the crossing point lies on a natural line between Ilford Town Centre and the Ilford to Barking cycle route. Residents who live on streets that lead onto, or have easy access to, the Ilford to Barking cycle route will be able to exit that route at Britannia Road, use the crossing to enter Albert Road and then use the cycle route to the High Street along Mildmay Road and under Winston Way.
Of the two options we prefer Option 2. It is well designed, and it separates pedestrians and cyclists. Local Transport Note 1/20 (LTN 1/20) recommends this approach. On page 9, Summary Principles, we read:
‘Shared use routes in streets with high pedestrian or cyclist flows should not be used. Instead, in these sorts of spaces distinct tracks for cyclists should be made, using sloping, pedestrian-friendly kerbs and/or different surfacing.’
Option 1 does not meet this principle.
Our only issue with the scheme is the proposal to make Britannia Road one-way. At the moment cyclists can use Britannia Road to ride to and from Ilford Town Centre. If Britannia Road is made one-way then cyclists will only be able to use it to ride to the town centre. They will not be able to use it to for their return journey. And, when a road like this is made one way, it is likely that, unless speed reduction measures are introduced, drivers will drive faster. This is because drivers will know that no vehicles will be coming the other way – meeting on-coming traffic slows drivers down. This can make one-way roads more, rather than less, dangerous for cyclists. The Oakdale area of South Woodford has one-way roads like this, and they are not nice to cycle along. So, if Britannia Road is made one-way as proposed, this could make matters worse rather than better for cyclists and the potential benefits for cycling offered by the crossing will not be realised. The proposal is also at odds with the guidance given in LTN 1/20 which states:
‘Contraflow cycle lanes and tracks
6.4.21 There should be a general presumption in favour of cycling in both directions in one way streets, unless there are safety, operational or cost reasons why it is not feasible’.
We think that the Council can easily adapt its proposal to comply with the guidance given in LTN 1/20. We are aware of two ways of doing this:
- Allow cyclists to ride the ‘wrong way’ along the road. There are examples of this arrangement in Hackney. If the Council adopts this approach, then we think it is important that it signals the contraflow arrangement at the junction of Riverdene and Britannia Roads. The Council can do this with road signs, but it could also consider putting in a traffic island to separate vehicles entering Brittania Road from Riverdene Road from cyclists coming along Britannia Road in the other direction (from Ilford Lane). But these contraflow arrangements can feel dangerous depending on the width of the road and the speed of oncoming vehicles. To an extent the Council can mitigate this perception of danger by the putting speed reduction measures.
Or Introduce a ‘point closure’ at the junction of Britannia Road and Ilford Lane making the road one-way at this point only but thereby stopping through traffic. As the rest of the road will be two way for the reasons we have given above, this will tend to reduce vehicle speeds. Drivers will expect oncoming vehicles – and so cyclists – and will reduce their speed accordingly. The Council introduced this type of closure on Nightingale Lane in Wanstead, and as far as we know it is a success.
Redbridge Cycling Campaign 